Apr 12, 2007, 11:43 AM // 11:43
|
#1
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: the Netherlands
Profession: W/Mo
|
MM vs tactics
What I mean by this is the following:
A player group can use tactics to be more effective. Using aggro properly or luring correctly and attacking the same target simultaneously are examples of this.
Contrary to that there are builds like the MM (though there are more examples) that can save the player group from the stupidity of 1 or more individual players. Examples would be the evercharging Wammo's , 3 players who are targetting and mainly targetting different targets because they think their idea is better than the others. Or players that aggro different enemy groups for the same reason. People who don't watch their compass and just end up aggroing multiple groups or the most hated leechers....etc. etc.
So I wonder what you all think of this. Because I think that part of PvE balancing problems is the fact that a party of 8 with let's say less experienced players has to face the same enemies as a well oiled fighting team of wintered players and be able to succeed.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 12:29 PM // 12:29
|
#2
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Apr 2006
Guild: House of Caeruleous [HoC]
Profession: R/E
|
Not quite sure what you are getting at. No offense to be taken, but all I see is a cloudy statement and no discussion. Maybe rephrase? There looks like there could be a discuss able topic in there.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 12:32 PM // 12:32
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Profession: R/
|
Summary?: Are MMs a simple way of avoiding using ability or tactics?
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 12:37 PM // 12:37
|
#4
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: EOA
Profession: P/W
|
Stop stereotyping w/mo. Just because they are expected to be the first to engage in combat they become the scapegoat when things go wrong.
on - topic
Your wording isnt too good but ill take a guess ,It sounds like your trying to say:
"People are using easier builds such as MM, rather than ones relying on tactics, why?"
Probably because theres a higher chance youl succeed with a bad MM than a bad blood necro. People like to play it safe and would rather not rely on skill, thats why 99% teams consist of: Healer,Tank,Nuker.
Last edited by FeroxC; Apr 12, 2007 at 12:40 PM // 12:40..
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 12:41 PM // 12:41
|
#5
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: R/
|
Group tactics > MM IMO.
At first glance I thought you were talking about the warrior attribute Tactics. :P
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 12:53 PM // 12:53
|
#6
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Thailand
Guild: Agot
Profession: N/
|
MM is not really my taste it just boring spamming blood of the master.I prefer death nova and kill my minons over keeping them alive.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 01:02 PM // 13:02
|
#7
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: the Netherlands
Profession: W/Mo
|
Sorry if it was unclear....do you agree that because of the wide range of skill level of the PvE players (mainly from the casual to the daily players) there is a need for some overpowered builds and/or skills? And that this has caused problems for classes like the mesmer and even attribute lines like hammer mastery or blood because the average player only sees the value of the MM's power over the less understood and more tactical choices?
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 01:06 PM // 13:06
|
#8
|
Hell's Protector
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/Mo
|
MM is just easier than actually thinking about positioning, proper pulling or shutdown.
Pure damage > Smarts in PvE
^_^
This fosters PvE players with no real gaming intelligence who suddenly run into brick walls when they run into missions that require it.
Hence you hear people whining about DOA...its not hard...just time consuming -.-
Last edited by lyra_song; Apr 12, 2007 at 01:09 PM // 13:09..
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 01:13 PM // 13:13
|
#9
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyra_song
MM is just easier than actually thinking
|
Yeah pretty much.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 02:32 PM // 14:32
|
#10
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: Dvd Forums [DVDF]
Profession: E/
|
MM + tactics = win
I don't know why a MM is outside the realm of tactics.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 02:58 PM // 14:58
|
#11
|
Hell's Protector
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/Mo
|
I dont think Cthulhu is saying an MM cannot be used with tactics.
I think what they are saying is, most people use MMs as a crutch to supplement intelligence and tactics.
In a hectic fight, with poor players running around like chickens with no heads, a MM can singlehandedly be the reason the party survives to move on to the next mob, thanks to the DPS.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 03:19 PM // 15:19
|
#12
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esprit
MM + tactics = win
I don't know why a MM is outside the realm of tactics.
|
It is not. It is just when you have almost endless supply of auto attacking meat shields, it lends to auto-piloting the mission.
Last edited by crimsonfilms; Apr 12, 2007 at 03:31 PM // 15:31..
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 03:49 PM // 15:49
|
#13
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Guild: Glengarry Fencibles
Profession: R/
|
The MM is easier for the casual player to pick and play due to the fact that any errors in judgement/tactics may not necessarily spell disaster to the minions offering you and escape route.
The Tactics and understanding of skills and the way they interact is not a simple process that most casual players will comprehend. With over 1700 skills, the party synergy is better understood by the more "hardcore" gamer.
That doesn't mean that casual players are any less intelligent or unable to think about the different skill combinations within each profession, then added to the secondary professions, then factor in a party of eight, or most often one player and seven heros/henchies.
It just means they don't have the time.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 04:00 PM // 16:00
|
#14
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: The Ascalon Union
Profession: Me/Mo
|
Are we talking about PuG here? Well, I'll say it anyway.
Imagine you're making a team with your guildmates. You know them well enough and know they're playing well. The mission you're going to do is quite hard, with some risky points that could lead to instant failure if things go wrong (let's just imagine that such place is existed ok? XD). Recap: You don't want to fail/replay too many times if at all. You're not doing it for fun today, you want to finish it.
Now, for some reasons, one of your guildmates tell you that instead of playing a Necro/Monk MM as he usually do, he'll bring his....Ranger/Necro MM instead. He says "Trust me, it works". And when you agree to let him use the build, some other people decide to bring some weird builds like "E/W Fire/Hammer melee" and "Mo/P Boon Chanter" and "Mesmer/Rt Spirit Spammer ("I know it doesn't work with Fast Cast", he says)" instead...
Question: What would you do?
Now, imagine this stuff happens in PuG, where you don't really know the person you're inviting and god knows how good he is at playing the game.
Can you blame people who want to play with something that works? Let's face it, even with the most-played build, there's still some chance of failure if the player playing the build is "very bad" at playing it. Do you risk it with some unknown builds, when you just want to finish the mission?
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 04:08 PM // 16:08
|
#15
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Guild: Twisted Revenge [TR]
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyra_song
Hence you hear people whining about DOA...its not hard...just time consuming -.-
|
/agree
(12 chars)
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 04:13 PM // 16:13
|
#16
|
Sins FTW!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Guild: Angel Sharks [AS]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esprit
MM + tactics = win
I don't know why a MM is outside the realm of tactics.
|
It doesn't have to be, but the fact is that minions are mindless, and even the best MM can't control what they do. How can you have tactics when your minions will follow a kiting priest into another group and aggro them? How can you have tactics when your minions wander a bit too far from the MM when running and trying to avoid a group of enemies nearby and end up aggroing said group? How can you have tactics when some minions have a delay of movement and linger behind long enough to aggro a wandering group behind you? It's too easy for a planned tactic to fail because of idiotic minion AI.
MM is a safety net for many people. Why set up a tactic to let only the warrior take an aggro when they can have an army of undead taking some of the damage for them? It's just the mind set many of the average/casual players use. They don't have or want to spend the time overanalyzing things when most of the time a MM will suffice.
Much of PvE is easy enough without planned tactics anyways
__________________
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 05:09 PM // 17:09
|
#17
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Frozen North
Guild: United Union
Profession: P/Rt
|
Most of the deep end-game or elite regions you can't really use an MM for anyhow, corpses aren't as frequent and everything else gets a magic little AI boost and also blows them all up in significantly less hits. Level 28 > level 18.
For the record: I prefer tactics. I prefer it enough that even one of my names is "Tactics Fairy".
I agree that its a safety net. Seriously, I've played as a minion master before, and I must say it makes the game's "easy mode" switch turn on. The enemy AI doesn't target around them, and even when it does, its probably too late for them anyhow. They provide solid buffers, and hiding places for your monks, or in the event that too many groups get pulled together. Some places, like the flame temple corridor if it were inhabited by level 26's, there are just too many closely positioned (though stationary) mobs for even a minion army to handle.
Keep in mind that minion masters have changed alot over time, first that there's now the minion-control limit and improvements to blood of the master, and now we also have the modification to Soul Reaping to deal with.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 05:14 PM // 17:14
|
#18
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Apr 2006
Guild: Alliance of Xen
Profession: R/Me
|
Just my two cents: Wouldn't it be smarter to use the easiest method to complete a given task? If a team with a MM can roll a mission with ease then what's wrong with using that method? Furthermore, if a group knows that they could complete the mission with a MM and one is available, but pass on the option because it's "NOOB" or does not require "skill" how is that smarter?
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 05:18 PM // 17:18
|
#19
|
Hall Hero
|
It's not only that minions provide some decent DPS. They're also some very helpful meatshields.
And easiness will always outwin tactics and strategy - because being a MM is easy.
|
|
|
Apr 12, 2007, 05:19 PM // 17:19
|
#20
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Some where in Cantha beyond the Petrified Forest and the Jade Sea
Guild: The Amazon Basin
|
From my experience as a MM I can say yes it can bea brain dead job, but the MM brings several items to the table such as Preventing damage and taking aggro of the enemy, distraction, damage, even regenerate energy for allies (I personally made my duty to bring Blood Rit). I hardly play my mm nec anymore since the release of NF since heros seem to be better playing one and who would want a human mm over a ninja reflex AI MM. I do agree how ever not every place a mm be used (I like playing a blood line Well/Damage nec from time).
I may be just your classic MM but I enjoy what I play. Personally with all the changes done to the various mm skills/Soul Reaping I wish they would remove the minion cap since with botm you will kill your self in one hit with too many:/ ( I miss the difficulty and challenge of maintaining a large army).
Overall a mm takes pressure off of the monks in the group.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 PM // 17:54.
|